Midterm: Self-evaluation

Looking at myself objectively, even though it is hard to evaluate own work as it is always flawless in creator's eyes, I strongly believe that I deserve at least A- as a midterm grade for several reasons.

The objectives for the grade is that blogging was consistent through out the semester. All of the asked blogging posts were researched and posted as asked on time. I have actively participated in class's discussions when they arose and took a load on my shoulders of the leading role for the great team of developers.

Written draft and final version of team project proposal.

Presented my proposal to the class in the 2 minute summary.

Reviewed all of the classmate's proposals, where three of those were reviewed in higher detail and detailed feedback.

The only deduction I should take on is for failing to post a follow up post/comment for final proposals' review. I did reviews of the first ~15 (from the bottom) and after that commented that it was taking too much time on reviewing all of them because they were all unique and I wanted to read all them in the great detail. By promising to give reviews only to the ones that spark my high interest, I did fail to post that none of the rest sparked any high interest, for the exception of Allen's and Katherine's proposals, which I reviewed previously in the draft versions. All the rest that I read were game proposals, ideas of which didn't seem to be unique.

In any case, I did provide three full reviews(with one being required) of draft proposals for Allen Hayward, Katherine Nystrom, and Jacob Hobbs.